The Trump administration has introduced production quotas for immigration
judges in an effort to reduce enormous court backlogs, raising concern
among judges and attorneys that decisions may be unfairly rushed.
The Justice Department's Executive Office for Immigration Review said
judges must complete 700 cases a year to earn a satisfactory grade. The
standards, which take effect Oct. 1, include six other measures indicating
how much time judges should spend on different types of cases and court motions.
The move, while significant, didn't come as a surprise. Attorney General
Jeff Sessions, who oversees immigration courts, has sought major changes
to the long-clogged courts as a sharp increase in deportation arrests
under President Donald Trump has pushed the backlog above 650,000 cases.
In December, Sessions wrote judges that performance measures would aid
in "the efficient and timely completion of cases and motions"
while maintaining fairness.
James McHenry, director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review,
used similar language in an email Friday that details the new measures
for the department's approximately 350 immigration judges.
"Using metrics to evaluate performance is neither novel nor unique
to (the Executive Office for Immigration Review)," McHenry wrote.
"The purpose of implementing these metrics is to encourage efficient
and effective case management while preserving immigration judge discretion
and due process."
The Associated Press obtained a copy of McHenry's memo and performance
plan, whose contents were
first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
The measures are highly specific. A judge who completes more than 560 cases
a year but fewer than 700 "needs improvement." Deciding fewer
than 560 cases a year is deemed unsatisfactory.
The Justice Department said Monday that judges complete an average of 678
cases a year.
Under one benchmark, judges must rule the same day on every plea by asylum
seekers to pass an initial threshold of establishing "credible"
or "reasonable" fear to earn a satisfactory mark, unless the
Homeland Security Department is responsible for them failing to show.
Anything less than 80 percent is considered unsatisfactory.
The National Immigration Judges Association, whose recent collective bargaining
agreement allows for performance metrics, strongly opposes the numerical
targets and will explore options under federal labor law, said Dana Leigh
Marks, a union spokeswoman.
"We believe the imposition of numerical performance metrics is completely,
utterly contrary to judicial independence," said Marks, who is also
an immigration judge in San Francisco. "We believe assessing quality
is fine, not quantity."
Judges can argue that the nature of their cases justifies a lower completion
rate, but Marks said keeping logs will add to their work burden and potentially
create more backlog. She also said people may be more inclined to appeal
decisions by arguing that the quotas denied them a fair hearing.
Laura Lynch, senior policy counsel for the American Immigration Lawyers
Association, said immigration attorneys were deeply concerned that cases
will be "rushed through."
"Subjecting judges to numerical goals undermines one of the core principles
of our judicial system, which is really a fair day in court," she said.
https://www.nbcnews.com/
REVILLA LAW FIRM, P.A.
Miami immigration attorneys
With all of the immigration headlines in the news, it’s understandable
that many people will have questions about how these issues and potential
shifts in policy could impact their status in this country. At Revilla
Law Firm, P.A., we welcome you to contact us if you have any concerns
or if you just need some legal guidance about any immigration issue. We
offer a free in-office immigration consultation in our Miami location.
Telephone consultations can also be arranged for a small fee.
Call us at (305) 858-2323 or toll free (877) 854-2323
We are available to help you navigate the complicated immigration process
and we will fight to keep you in the United States.
