The president granted himself sweeping authority to step up deportations,
and he's poised to use it.
The arrests of hundreds of immigrants last week marked the first large-scale
raid under the Trump administration — and the crackdown was, by
all indications, just the start of much more to come.
The expansive executive order signed last month by President Donald Trump
allows a significantly broader population of immigrants to be picked up
for deportation. And Trump has signaled he has every intention of using
that authority to carry out his campaign pledge to deport millions of
foreigners from the United States.
Immigration advocates say the stepped-up enforcement amounts to a new deportation
dragnet that’s ensnaring otherwise law-abiding immigrants.
“In four weeks, we’ve seen three incredibly harsh executive
orders targeting the immigrant community,” said Ali Noorani, executive
director of the National Immigration Forum. “This is what he campaigned
on, and now the country has to deal with the consequences.”
But for Trump, it’s working out just as planned.
“We’re actually taking people that are criminals — very,
very hardened criminals in some cases — with a tremendous track
record of abuse and problems, and we are getting them out,” Trump
said at a news conference Monday with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
“And that’s what I said I would do.”
One of Trump’s top advisers, Stephen Miller, also credited the administration’s
new executive order with the “more vigorous immigration enforcement
activities,” telling Fox News that Trump has “taken new and
greater steps to remove criminal aliens from our communities.”
In a statement Monday, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly confirmed
that more than 680 immigrants were swept up in so-called “targeted
enforcement operations” across several cities, including Los Angeles,
Chicago, Atlanta, San Antonio and New York City.
About three-fourths of those arrested were immigrants who had been convicted
of crimes ranging from homicide, aggravated sexual abuse and drunken driving.
The rest were picked up for various immigration violations, such as illegally
reentering the country after being removed.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials, as well as Kelly himself,
have maintained that the raids were nothing more than routine operations
that immigration authorities have carried out for years, including under
the Obama administration.
But immigration advocates say the Trump administration has the capacity
to go far beyond what President Barack Obama — who deported more
than 2 million undocumented immigrants during his tenure — ever did.
In his Jan. 25 executive order, Trump said any immigrant who had been merely
charged with a crime could be targeted for deportation. That’s a
significant departure from Obama’s policy: the previous administration
primarily sought out only immigrants who had been convicted of felonies
or at least three misdemeanors.
The Trump directive also calls on federal authorities to target immigrants
who have “committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense,”
which immigrant advocates say is too broad a description.
Another major change: The Obama administration largely gave a pass to law-abiding
immigrants who arrived illegally before January 2014. But the Trump directive
contains no similar cutoff date, meaning immigration agents are free to
target immigrants who have lived in the United States for decades.
Even the less-prominent provisions in Trump’s order could, in the
advocates’ view, wrongly ensnare immigrants. For instance, the order
deems those who have “engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation”
before the government as priorities. That could mean that immigrants accused
of lying during a green card interview could be targeted for deportation,
according to Cleveland-based immigration attorney David Leopold.
“When you read that executive order, there is no other conclusion
that you can draw except that everybody is a target. Everybody,”
said Leopold, former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
“It’s carefully couched in terms of prioritizing criminals,
but it’s designed to encourage and allow ICE agents to pick up anybody
they can get their hands on.”
Criticism of the Trump administration’s far-reaching crackdown has
been mounting for days, although it has largely focused on a separate
order that called for barring travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations,
as well as all refugees. That directive has been blocked by the courts.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Monday that ICE officials
need to be more forthcoming about the nature of the agency’s most
recent raid operations, including where they were held and details of
immigrants who were arrested.
“I have always supported smart immigration enforcement that helps
to keep our country safe,” Schumer said Monday. “But raids
targeting law-abiding immigrants and treating those with traffic violations
the same as murderers and robbers will only achieve the opposite.”
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) has already called for hearings to investigate
Trump’s trio of immigration executive orders, and Congressional
Hispanic Caucus leaders are meeting with acting ICE director Thomas Homan
on Tuesday to discuss the raids.
But advocates for a tougher approach to illegal immigration said the raids
— and Trump’s pledge to keep up the enforcement tactics —
are nothing more than a return to what was commonplace before Obama loosened
some deportation priorities.
Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies,
called the roundups “a start” and added that he would like
to see “more systematic efforts” to target employers who hire
He called the reaction from immigrant rights groups “hysterical”
and “almost comically exaggerated.” In his view, organizations
grew too accustomed to lax enforcement under Obama.
“This is a return to normalcy, if you will, rather than some kind
of radical departure,” Krikorian said. “It was Obama that
represented the radical change in practice.”
Roy Beck of NumbersUSA says he prefers mandatory E-Verify — an internet-based
system that allows businesses to check whether employees are in the U.S.
legally — instead of wide-scale arrests. But until Congress passes
a law requiring businesses to use the verification system, raids are the
best tactic available, he said.
The recent raids are sending waves of fear through immigrant communities
across the country, immigrant advocates say. They’ve been scrambling
in recent days to respond to reports of ICE activity and to keep track
of where enforcement actions have taken place, with little assistance
from federal immigration authorities.
Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant
Rights of Los Angeles, said her organization had received 2,000 calls
from worried residents in recent days.
Others worry that with ICE agents greatly empowered to make arrests, undocumented
immigrants who answer the door will be nabbed even if those individuals
aren’t the intended target of the operation.
One frequently cited case is that of Manuel Mosqueda Lopez, a 50-year-old
house painter in Los Angeles who was arrested by ICE after agents came
to his home looking for someone else. He was put on a bus to Tijuana and
nearly deported before his lawyers intervened.
The lack of information from federal immigration authorities has further
disquieted immigrant rights leaders. But Claude Arnold, a retired ICE
special agent in charge based in Los Angeles, said it’s routine
for the agency to withhold details of an operation in order to protect agents.
ICE could also begin to use mobile units to scan fingerprints of suspected
undocumented immigrants found during enforcement operations, Arnold said.
He said the fingerprint scans are an alternative to physically arresting
someone who is in the country illegally but doesn’t stand out as
a priority. In the past, officers used the scans to place undocumented
immigrants in removal proceedings without a formal arrest, Arnold said.
Arnold added that doesn’t think ICE will suddenly target noncriminals.
“The priorities are still going to be the same priorities, criminals
first,” he said. “But what the president’s executive
order did do, it returned discretion to arrest and not to arrest to the
line-level officer. … If they encounter someone who’s here
illegally, they have the authority and discretion to arrest them, period.”
Nolan McCaskill contributed to this report.
REVILLA LAW FIRM, P.A.
Miami Deportation Defense Lawyers
The Miami immigration lawyers at Revilla Law Firm, P.A., represent clients
in all areas of immigration law with a concentration on deportation defense.
We have helped thousands of people avoid deportation from the United States
with our extensive experience, our knowledge of immigration laws and procedures,
and our unwavering committment to our clients.
Antonio G. Revilla III is a Former U.S. Immigration Prosecutor with over
25 years of legal experience. Mr. Revilla's invaluable experience
as a former prosecutor makes him uniquely qualified to handle even the
most challenging immigration cases.
With the recent changes in immigration policy under President Trump, our
Miami immigration attorneys are prepared to assist you with any legal
issue. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you
may have about your immigration status.
We offer a free initial consultation in our Miami office. We also conduct
telephone consultations for a nominal fee.
Call us at (305) 858-2323 or toll free (877) 854-2323
"We will fight to keep families together. We will fight to keep you
in the United States."